← SSI archive

SSI review rubric · 106 reviewed pages · 570 evidence records

How the SSI reviews work.

This page explains the fields used on each paper page. It stays inside repository data, and it does not invent peer-review status, scores, or outside validation.

Core fields

rubric field

review_state

Shows whether the page is still a draft, a full-text draft, or something further along.

rubric field

review_priority

Marks which papers deserve attention first inside the SSI review queue.

rubric field

review_confidence

States how certain the judgment is when the source record is incomplete or strong.

rubric field

review_basis

Explains whether the judgment came from full text, existing expert seeds, or another recorded basis.

rubric field

source_coverage

Shows how much source material was available when the review record was written.

rubric field

axes_moved

Lists the field dimensions the paper genuinely advances, such as wearability or open vocabulary.

rubric field

axes_unresolved

Lists open problems that remain visible in the review instead of being hidden.

rubric field

axes_regressed

Records tradeoffs or regressions when a paper improves one axis but weakens another.

rubric field

claim_evidence_alignment

Captures how closely the paper's claims match the available evidence.

rubric field

overclaim_risk

Flags where the language should stay cautious because the evidence does not justify stronger wording.

rubric field

deployment_readiness_gap

Highlights what still blocks practical use outside the paper setting.

rubric field

generalization_gap

Highlights where the result still needs broader testing before it should be treated as general.

Entry papers in use

The three current entry pages are all full-text reviewed with high source coverage.

Reading rule

no invention

If a field is missing, it stays missing.

The paper pages prefer omission over guessed metadata. That keeps the archive reproducible.